- Defamation
- A false statement of fact, published to a third party, that harms someone's reputation. Written defamation is libel; spoken defamation is slander. Opinions and true statements are generally not defamation. Public figures face a higher bar to win (they must prove the statement was made with knowledge it was false or reckless disregard for the truth). Your Media policy covers defense and damages for defamation claims arising from your published content.
- Copyright Infringement
- Using someone else's copyrighted work — photos, text, music, illustrations, code, video — without authorization. You don't have to intend to infringe; even accidental use of an unlicensed stock photo can trigger a claim with statutory damages.
- Product Disparagement
- A false statement of fact about a competitor's product or service that causes them economic harm. This is the risk in comparative marketing — when you claim a competitor's product is unreliable, insecure, or inferior, and they believe the claim is false and damaging.
- Invasion of Privacy
- A family of legal claims related to unreasonable intrusion into someone's private life. For media purposes, the most relevant type is "public disclosure of private facts" — publishing truthful but private information that a reasonable person would find highly offensive.
- Claims-Made
- Coverage applies only if the claim is first made during the policy period. If you publish a blog post in January, a competitor reads it in June, and their lawyer sends a demand letter in September, coverage depends on whether September falls within your policy period (and the post was published after your retroactive date).
- Defense Costs Within Limits
- Legal defense expenses reduce the total policy limit available. Media claims can involve significant discovery costs (reviewing years of published content), so this erosion matters. Plan your limits accordingly.
- Knowing False Statement Exclusion
- The policy does not cover statements the insured knew were false when published. This is the line between a covered negligent error and an excluded intentional falsehood. If your marketing team genuinely believed the comparison was accurate, that's different from knowingly publishing false performance data.